 |
Nuclear New Build
|
||||||
 |
Environment Agency consultation on radioactive discharges from Hinkley C - please make your objection! Please make sure you send an objection to EDF's application to discharge radioactive substances into the air and sea from the proposed Hinkley C power station. Click here for a suggested letter of objection. Please email or post it to arrive by December 15th.
|
|||||
|
29 Jul 11: West Somerset Councillors Could Live to Regret Groundworks Approval: The decision by West Somerset Council to approve major groundworks at Hinkley Point has allowed energy company EdF to "jump the gun" on its plans for a nuclear power station, the Stop Hinkley campaign said today. More>>> |
|||||
| ||||||
|
German Ethics Commission Report on Safe Energy Supply - German Energy Turnaround. The Commission has presented its official report to Chancellor Merkel. The coalition agreed to phase out nuclear power by 2022. Read the report in English here. |
|||||
|
Find out about the work the Environment Agency are doing at the Hinkley Point nuclear power stations and the proposed development at Hinkley Point C. |
|||||
|
In Brussels to mark the 25th anniversary of Chernobyl, the Green European Foundation spoke with independent nuclear consultant Mycle Schneider in a wide ranging interview which addressed issues such as the fallout from Fukushima, the recent u-turn by the German Government and the future for nuclear energy in countries such as China and the US. Click here |
|||||
|
May 2011: Even before the disaster in Fukushima, the world's nuclear industry was in clear decline, according to a new report from the Worldwatch Institute. The report, commissioned months before the Fukushima crisis began, paints a bleak picture of an aging industry unable to keep pace with its renewable energy competitors. To download a free copy of this report, click here. |
|||||
|
||||||
|
25 March 2011: Calls For Latest Nuclear Regulations To Be Quashed: A LANCASHIRE man who is opposed to Government plans to introduce up to 20 new nuclear reactors across the UK has launched a High Court legal challenge against the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change. Read more >>> |
|||||
|
23 Feb 2011: A COMPLAINT TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ABOUT SUBSIDIES FOR NUCLEAR POWER: A formal complaint has been made to the European Commission that nuclear power in the UK is receiving subsidies, and that those subsidies are unlawful 'state aid' under laws governing competition in the EU. More>>> |
|||||
|
||||||
|
Stop Hinkley's Response to the DECC's Consultation on Electricity Market Reforms |
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
EdF's Application for Hinkley C "Preliminary Works": How To Object Make sure you register your objection to EdF's application to carry out "Preliminary Works" for Hinkley C - in advance of receiving consent to build the power station itself. Full details of how to object can be found here. Although the official deadline was 31st January it is still possible to lodge your objection at any time before the Council meets to decide the application. |
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
With the new opportunities brought about by a change in Government, we urge people to write to the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change. We hope he sticks to his pledge not to subsidise the nuclear industry and bring on the public inquiry on nuclear justification which top academics have called for. Here is a draft letter that you can download and use unchanged or add your own words. |
|||||
|
Stop Hinkley response to Generic Design Assessment UK EPR nuclear power plant design Consultation document (October 2010) |
|||||
|
||||||
|
The Local Impacts. Hinkley C will turn part of Somerset into a giant industrial site. |
|||||
|
April 2010: The Right to Know. Oldbury Nuclear Expansion and Your Safety - the risks to the people of Gloucestershire. A report by Gaian Economics, commissioned by Martin Whiteside, Green Party Parliamentary Candidate for Stroud. |
|||||
|
USA Enters Stiff International Competition for Next Chernobyl Explosion: The story begins with the nation that gave us the Statue of Liberty. Now, our French friends have a new type of gift to give. Electricite de France has several new, experimental reactors both under contract and under construction in several nations. |
|||||
|
Lecture in Australia in March 2010 by Mark Diesendorf. The promoters of nuclear power claim that we have to choose between coal and nuclear, that there is no alternative. This is a false choice. The real choice is between dirty and dangerous technologies (coal and nuclear) on one hand and clean and safe technologies (energy efficiency and renewable energy) on the other hand.
|
|||||
|
A Renewable World: Energy, Ecology, Equality: By Herbert Girardet and Miguel Mendonça. ISBN: 978-1900322492, Publisher: Green Books The post-Copenhagen world requires a fresh look at the big picture. In the absence of international agreements, what steps can be taken to reduce both carbon emissions and carbon concentrations? A Renewable World features solutions on renewable energy, biosequestration, energy sufficiency, energy for developing countries, green collar jobs, cities, transport, agriculture and food, regional economies, and civil participation and democracy. It seeks to clarify what can be done, and how we can all benefit, long into the future. Chapter 9 [click here], on problematic technologies, gives a lot of info about nuclear. |
|||||
|
||||||
|
Response from Stop Hinkley to the Justification consultation. Our group is not convinced that nuclear power is safe either in terms of health effects that are likely to occur to communities near the plants, nor in terms of protection from a serious 'containment by-pass' accident. February 2010 |
|||||
|
In 2007, Corporate Watch produced a report on the nuclear industry titled BROKEN PROMISES: WHY THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY WON'T DELIVER By Chris Grimshaw & Olaf Bayer. Throughout its fifty year history, Britain 's nuclear industry has consistently failed to deliver on its promises. Whilst some of this material is now out of date, most of it is still relevant. The report outlined the nuclear sector and its companies; contemporary political positions; and nuclear power's history of overestimated capacities and consistent under performance: delays and budget overruns, reduced power and reliance on large government subsidy. Download here: http://www.corporatewatch.org/?lid=2968 |
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
|
Terrorism: EdF wrote to the French Government after 9/11, in 2003, saying their reactors could resist a military aircraft crashing into one of their EPR reactors now proposed for Hinkley Point. It would be the responsibility of the French Government to prevent a more serious deliberate attack. Resisting is not the same as withstanding a deliberate attack, especially that of a massive jet airliner filled with fuel. The carefully worded letter just says that the ability to resist a military plane gives 'an important capacity' to the EPR to resist the impact of a commercial airliner crashing into it. Since the letter became public in 2006 through anti-nuclear group Sortir du Nuclaire, EdF claim to have reinforced the design. But the question remains, how much extra reinforcement can a reactor design take before it really needs to be taken back to square one? Read the letter from the EDF's Director Energy Department
to The Director of Radioprotection and Nuclear Security |
| NFLA 'New Nuclear Monitor' edition 17 NFLA 'New Nuclear Monitor' edition 18 |
These provide a thorough overview of the UK Government's National Policy Statement on Nuclear Power Generation' and the Government's draft decision Justifying new nuclear power stations. The policy papers provide an effective summary of the core arguments that the Nuclear Free Local Authorities will put forward in its response to these crucial consultations which close on February 22nd 2010. |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
Safety regulator may pull the plug on Hinkley C prototype: The nuclear regulator governing the go-ahead of the Hinkley C prototype currently being built in Finland has threatened to withold its approval because it is afraid the safety systems will not work while condemning the 'lack of professional knowledge' of those working for the design company. More>>> |
|
|
Nuclear Power and the Probability of Severe Accidents:
The Department of Energy and Climate Change reported that the probability of a 'severe' accident, (ie one that would kill at least one hundred people), was one chance in 10 million per year for a modern nuclear reactor. In this short briefing, the comparable figure for a severe accident at the Sellafield nuclear site is set out - and compared with actual incidence of critical malfunction at the Sellafield site. Read more >>> |
|
|
||
|
'Nuclear NO Build at Hinkley!' Top consultant speaks on risks of new reactors. Stop Hinkley and Sedgemoor Green Party held a public meeting in October. John Large presented his up-to-date prediction of the radiological consequences of a severely damaging incident at Hinkley Point. The PowerPoint Presentation and Summary are now available on the Large & Associates web site. Click here |
|
|
Another nuclear consultation was fixed: It's official, Brown's personal pollsters tried to fix another public consultation on new nuclear power. |
|
|
1 Aug 2008: Implications of the UK meeting its 2020 renewable energy targets. If the government is serious about renewables and energy efficiency, Britain doesn't need to build major new power stations to keep the lights on, according to this report by independent energy experts Pöyry. |
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
Jonathan Porritt explains why nuclear plans are totally wrong. A new nuclear power station at Hinkley point is not needed and would leave an unacceptable legacy to future generations. Jonathon Porritt voiced his views to a packed meeting of local anti-nuclear campaigners who are opposing the Somerset scheme.
If the video is blocked by your computer, click here to see part of Jonathon Porritt's talk on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RlacFBIlew |
|---|
 |
|---|
No-one knows the cost of nuclear power. We won't be able to add up the final bill for over a thousand years.
Page Updated 01-Feb-2012 |
